Blog #2 | 2023

Navigating the JAWRA Peer Review Process

Introduction

Navigating the peer review process can be a challenging but essential part of the academic publishing journey, especially for water resource scientists and students looking to publish their work in journals like the Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA). In this blog, we'll provide insights into the peer review process at JAWRA, tips for authors on addressing reviewer comments effectively and strategies for increasing the chances of a successful review process.

Explanation of the Peer Review Process at JAWRA:

The peer review process at JAWRA, like most academic journals, involves several key steps:

1. Submission: Authors submit their research papers to JAWRA for consideration. The submitted manuscripts should adhere to the journal's guidelines, including formatting, referencing, and content.
2. Editorial Assessment: Upon submission, the manuscript is first reviewed by the journal's editors. They assess the paper's suitability for the journal, its alignment with the journal's scope, and its overall quality. Manuscripts that meet these criteria move on to the peer review stage.
3. Peer Review: JAWRA employs a double-blind peer review process, meaning that the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept confidential. The manuscript is sent to experts in the field (typically two or more reviewers) who evaluate the paper's methodology, results, significance, and overall quality. Reviewers provide constructive feedback and make recommendations for revisions or acceptance.
4. Author Revisions: Authors receive feedback from the reviewers and are given the opportunity to revise their manuscript accordingly. This step may involve addressing reviewer comments, improving clarity, and refining the research.
5. Decision: The revised manuscript is re-evaluated by the editors and reviewers. Based on their feedback, a decision is made regarding acceptance, rejection, or the need for further revisions.
6. Publication: Once accepted, the manuscript undergoes final editing and formatting before being published in the journal.

Tips for Authors on Addressing Reviewer Comments Effectively:

Addressing reviewer comments effectively is crucial for a successful peer review process:

1. Be receptive: Approach reviewer comments with an open mind and a willingness to improve your work.
2. Organize and prioritize: Systematically address each comment, starting with major concerns and working your way to minor ones.
3. Provide clear responses: In your revision, clearly indicate how you've addressed each comment or concern raised by the reviewers.
4. Respectful tone: Maintain a respectful and professional tone in your responses, even if you disagree with a reviewer's suggestion.
5. Seek clarification: If you don't fully understand a comment, don't hesitate to seek clarification from the reviewer or editor.

Strategies for Increasing the Chances of a Successful Review Process:

To increase your chances of a successful peer review process at JAWRA:

1. Read the journal's guidelines: Familiarize yourself with JAWRA's specific submission guidelines and requirements to ensure your manuscript meets their standards.
2. Select appropriate reviewers: Suggest potential reviewers who are experts in your field but have no conflicts of interest.
3. Thoroughly proofread and edit: Ensure your manuscript is well-written, clear, and free from grammatical errors and typos.
4. Conduct robust research: Your research should be scientifically sound and contribute significantly to the field of water resources.
5. Stay patient and persistent: The peer review process can be time-consuming. Be patient and willing to make multiple revisions if necessary.

In conclusion, understanding the peer review process at JAWRA, effectively addressing reviewer comments and implementing strategies for success, can help you navigate the publication journey and contribute to the advancement of our field.